The Ethics of Non-Reciprocal Banquets in Luke 14:12–14: A Socio-Rhetorical Exegesis on Favoring the Poor

Authors

  • Raulina Raulina Sekolah Tinggi Teologi HKBP Pematangsiantar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33856/kerusso.v11i1.613

Keywords:

hospitality; Luke 14:12–14; patron-client reciprocity; the poor; Christian ethics; Lukan theology

Abstract

In exegetical discourse, Luke 14:12–14 is often understood through a moralistic-charitable lens, specifically as an individual ethical exhortation to do good to the poor. This approach tends to overlook the socio-structural dimensions of the text, particularly its critique of the reciprocity practices inherent in the patron-client system of the first-century Mediterranean world. Addressing this gap, this study aims to reinterpret Luke 14:12–14 as a theological critique of the logic of relationships based on honor and reciprocity. This research employs a socio-rhetorical exegetical approach, emphasizing the analysis of socio-cultural and ideological textures. An analysis of the structure of Jesus' commands and the context of the banquet reveals that the prohibition against inviting those capable of repayment, alongside the command to invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind, constitutes a subversion of the patron-client reciprocity system. Jesus asserts that the reward does not originate from social relationships, but rather from God at the resurrection of the righteous. The findings of this study indicate that Luke 14:12–14 constructs a concept of non-reciprocal hospitality that transcends mere charitable acts, functioning as a concrete expression of the values of the Kingdom of God. Thus, the text speaks not only on the level of personal ethics but also embodies a critique of exclusive social structures. In practical terms, this research provides a theological foundation for Christian communities to cultivate hospitality practices that are inclusive, egalitarian, and transformative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aland, B., Aland, K., Karavidopoulos, J., Martini, C. M., & Metzger, B. M. (Eds.). (2012). Novum Testamentum Graece (28th ed.). Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.

Arterbury, A. E. (2005). Entertaining angels: Early Christian hospitality in its Mediterranean setting. Sheffield Phoenix Press.

Bailey, K. E. (2008). Jesus through Middle Eastern eyes: Cultural studies in the Gospels. IVP Academic.

Bovon, F. (2012). Luke 2: A commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9:51–19:27 (D. S. Deer, Trans.; Hermeneia Series). Fortress Press.

Bretherton, L. (2006). Hospitality as holiness: Christian witness amid moral diversity. Ashgate.

Candra, T. P. (2025). Tinjauan eklesiologis Lukas 14:12-24 dalam membangun pelayanan inklusif bagi penyandang disabilitas. Jurnal Therapeuo Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 3(2), 226-241.

DeSilva, D. A. (2004). An introduction to the New Testament: Contexts, methods and ministry formation. InterVarsity Press.

DeSilva, D. A. (2022). Honor, patronage, kinship & purity: Unlocking New Testament culture (2nd ed.). IVP Academic.

Fee, G. D., & Stuart, D. (2014). How to read the Bible for all its worth (4th ed.). Zondervan.

Fitzmyer, J. A. (1985). The Gospel according to Luke X–XXIV: Introduction, translation, and notes (Anchor Bible, Vol. 28A). Doubleday.

Green, J. B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke (The New International Commentary on the New Testament). Eerdmans.

Hays, C. M. (2010). Luke’s wealth ethics: A study in their coherence and character. Mohr Siebeck.

Johnson, L. T. (1981). Sharing possessions: Mandate and symbol of faith. Fortress Press.

Karris, R. J. (1985). Luke: Artist and theologian. Paulist Press.

Koenig, J. (2001). New Testament hospitality: Partnership with strangers as promise and mission. Wipf and Stock.

Malina, B. J. (2001). The New Testament world: Insights from cultural anthropology (3rd ed.). Westminster John Knox Press.

Malina, B. J., & Rohrbaugh, R. L. (2003). Social-science commentary on the Synoptic Gospels (2nd ed.). Fortress Press.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Masinambow, Y., & Watulingas, F. (2024). Teokrasi pelayanan Yesus yang menghadirkan kesetaraan kemanusiaan bagi orang-orang miskin dalam Injil Matius dan Lukas. AMBASSADORS: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani, 3(2), 64-74.

Méndez-Montoya, Á. F. (2009). The theology of food: Eating and the Eucharist. Wiley-Blackwell.

Moxnes, H. (2003). Putting Jesus in his place: A radical vision of household and kingdom. Westminster John Knox Press.

Neyrey, J. H. (1991a). The social world of Luke-Acts: Models for interpretation. Hendrickson Publishers.

Neyrey, J. H. (1991b). The symbolic universe of Luke–Acts: "They turn the world upside down." In J. H. Neyrey (Ed.), The social world of Luke–Acts: Models for interpretation (pp. 271–304). Hendrickson Publishers.

Neyrey, J. H. (1998). Honor and shame in the Gospel of Matthew. Westminster John Knox Press.

Neyrey, J. H., & Stewart, E. C. (Eds.). (2008). The social world of the New Testament: Insights and models. Hendrickson.

Nolland, J. (1993). Luke 9:21–18:34 (Word Biblical Commentary, Vol. 35B). Word Books.

Osborne, G. R. (2006). The hermeneutical spiral: A comprehensive introduction to biblical interpretation (2nd ed.). IVP Academic.

Pohl, C. D. (1999). Making room: Recovering hospitality as a Christian tradition. Eerdmans.

Reynolds, T. E. (2008). Vulnerable communion: A theology of disability and hospitality. Brazos Press.

Robbins, V. K. (1996a). Exploring the texture of texts: A guide to socio-rhetorical interpretation. Trinity Press International.

Robbins, V. K. (1996b). The tapestry of early Christian discourse: Rhetoric, society and ideology. Routledge.

Rohrbaugh, R. L. (1991). The pre-industrial city in Luke–Acts: Urban social relations. In J. H. Neyrey (Ed.), The social world of Luke–Acts: Models for interpretation (pp. 125–149). Hendrickson Publishers.

Seccombe, D. P. (1982). Possessions and the poor in Luke-Acts. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

Siahaan, H. E. R., Kause, M., & Siagian, F. (2022). Teologi Hospitalitas: Sebuah Diskursus Konstruktif Agama Merevitalisasi Nilai-nilai Kemanusiaan. KAMBOTI: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.51135/kambotivol2issue2page134-143

Smith, D. E. (2003). From symposium to Eucharist: The banquet in the early Christian world. Fortress Press.

Solevåg, A. K. (2018). Negotiating the disabled body: Representations of disability in early Christian texts. SBL Press.

Susanta, Y. K., & Panuntun, D. F. (2021). Karantina dan hospitalitas sebagai yang berisiko sebagai respons gereja di sepanjang sejarah pandemi. Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan, 19(1), 175-206.

Takene, A. C., & de Haan, A. E. M. (2021). Gereja dan tanggung jawab sosial: Kajian Lukas 14:12-14 dan persoalan kemiskinan di GMIT. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(6), 1610–1628. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v8i6.2021.1610-1628

Tannehill, R. C. (1991). The narrative unity of Luke–Acts: A literary interpretation (Vol. 1: The Gospel according to Luke). Fortress Press.

Taussig, H. (2009). In the beginning was the meal: Social experimentation and early Christian identity. Fortress Press.

Volf, M. (2015). Exclusion and embrace: A theological exploration of identity, otherness, and reconciliation (Rev. ed.). Abingdon Press.

Wallace, D. B. (1996). Greek grammar beyond the basics: An exegetical syntax of the New Testament. Zondervan.

Wright, N. T. (2003). The resurrection of the Son of God. Fortress Press.

Wright, N. T. (2013). Paul and the faithfulness of God. Fortress Press.

Yong, A. (2007). Theology and Down syndrome: Reimagining disability in late modernity. Baylor University Press.

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Raulina, R. (2026). The Ethics of Non-Reciprocal Banquets in Luke 14:12–14: A Socio-Rhetorical Exegesis on Favoring the Poor. Jurnal Teologi Dan Pelayanan Kerusso, 11(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.33856/kerusso.v11i1.613

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.