Thomas Jay Oord’s Open and Relational Theology: Divine Sovereignty and Human Free Will
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33856/kerugma.v8i1.487Keywords:
Open and relational theology; divine sovereignty; free will; divine foreknowledge; determinism; biblical hermeneuticsAbstract
Open and Relational Theology, developed by Thomas Jay Oord, presents a controversial theological paradigm that emphasizes God’s openness and human free will as determinative factors for the future. This concept challenges traditional understandings of divine sovereignty and foreknowledge. This study aims to critically analyze the theological foundations of Open and Relational Theology, examine its implications for the doctrine of God’s sovereignty, and evaluate its consistency with biblical hermeneutics. Employing a qualitative approach, this research utilizes doctrinal analysis and comparative literature review. Primary data consists of Thomas Jay Oord’s works and related systematic theological literature, while secondary data includes theological journals and academic critiques of Open Theism. The findings reveal that Oord’s Open and Relational Theology constructs a mutual and interdependent God-human relationship, wherein divine foreknowledge is limited by human free will. This concept implies an indeterministic and probabilistic future, which stands in contrast to the doctrine of divine sovereignty in orthodox theology. Hermeneutical analysis uncovers inconsistencies with the biblical narrative of God's sovereign plan. Although Oord’s Open and Relational Theology offers a potential solution to the problem of theodicy, it fundamentally weakens the concept of divine sovereignty and introduces the risk of theological relativism in scriptural interpretation. Its practical implications may significantly alter the foundations of orthodox Christian faith.
Downloads
References
Almost Heretical. (2024, April 3). Thomas Jay Oord: Open relational theology. Almost Heretical. https://almostheretical.com/thomas-jay-oord-open-relational-theology/
Blackburn, S. (2004). Women and the State in Modern Indonesia. Cambridge University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Boyd, G. A. (2000). God of the possible: A biblical introduction to the open view of God. Baker Books.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Calvin, J. (1559). Institutes of the Christian Religion. Trans. F. L. Battles. Westminster John Knox Press.
Christianity Today. (2007, Januari 12). Family feud. Christianity Today. https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/january/31.61.html
Clayton, P. (2004). Mind and emergence: From quantum to consciousness. Oxford University Press.
Cooper, H. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Craig, W. L. (2008.). Doctrine of salvation (part 4): Arminianism continued. Reasonable Faith.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gunton, C. E. (1993). The One, the Three and the Many: God, creation and the culture of modernity. Cambridge University Press.
Hart, D. B. (2013). The experience of God: Being, consciousness, bliss. Yale University Press.
Hartshorne, C. (1984). Omnipotence and other theological mistakes. State University of New York Press.
Hasker, W. (2004). Providence, evil, and the openness of God. Routledge.
Hasker, W., Basinger, D., Pinnock, C., Rice, R., & Sanders, J. (1994). The openness of God: A biblical challenge to the traditional understanding of God. InterVarsity Press.
InterVarsity Press. (2018.). Thomas Jay Oord. https://www.ivpress.com/thomas-jay-oord
McGrath, A. E. (2017). Christian theology: An introduction (6th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
McKinley, J. E. (2016). Tempted for us: Theological models and the practical relevance of Christ's impeccability and temptation. Paternoster Press.
Northwind Theological Seminary. (2006). Thomas J Oord, Ph.D. https://www.northwindseminary.org/faculty-bio-pages/single/thomas-j-oord,-ph.d
Olson, R. E. (1999, September 6). Don't hate me because I'm Arminian: My Reformed friends sometimes treat me like the enemy, but actually we need each other. Christianity Today, 87-94.
Olson, R. E. (2006). Arminian theology: Myths and realities. InterVarsity Press.
Oord, T. J. (2010). Defining love: A philosophical, scientific, and theological engagement. Brazos Press.
Oord, T. J. (2015). The uncontrolling love of God: An open and relational account of providence. IVP Academic.
Oord, T. J. (2017, May 30). Arminius on foreknowledge and predestination. For The Love of Wisdom and The Wisdom of Love.
https://thomasjayoord.com/index.php/blog/archives/arminius_on_foreknowledge_and_predestination
Oord, T. J. (2018). God can't: How to believe in God and love after tragedy, abuse, and other evils. SacraSage Press.
Thomas Jay Oord. (2010). Defining love: A philosophical, scientific, and theological engagement. https://www.amazon.com/Defining-Love-Philosophical-Scientific-Theological/dp/1587432579
Thomas Jay Oord. (2015). The uncontrolling love of God: An open and relational account of providence.
https://www.amazon.com/Uncontrolling-Love-God-Relational-Providence/dp/0830840842
Oord, T. J. (2020, December 16). Open theism and divine limitations. For The Love of Wisdom and The Wisdom of Love.
https://thomasjayoord.com/index.php/blog/archives/open-theism-and-the-question-of-divine-limitations
Oord, T. J. (2021). Open and relational theology: An introduction to life-changing ideas. SacraSage Press.
Oord, T. J. (2025). For the love of wisdom and the wisdom of love. https://thomasjayoord.com/
Oord, T. J., & Lodahl, M. (2014). Relational holiness: Responding to the call of love. Beacon Hill Press.
Orr, B. J. (2020, December 18). A reformed evangelical critique of Thomas Jay Oord's evangelical process theology. Academia.edu.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pinnock, C. H. (2001). Most moved mover: A theology of God's openness. Baker Academic.
Polkinghorne, J. (2001). Faith, science and understanding. Yale University Press.
Process & Faith. (n.d.). Thomas Jay Oord. https://processandfaith.org/thomas-jay-oord/
ResearchGate. (2018.). Thomas Oord - Professor and Director of Doctoral Program. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas-Oord
Rice, R. (1985). God's foreknowledge and man's free will. Bethany House Publishers.
Sanders, J. (1998). The God who risks: A theology of divine providence. IVP Academic.
Sunday, B. (2020, November 15). Difference between Calvinism and Arminianism. The Brand Sunday.
https://www.thebrandsunday.com/blogs/home/difference-between-calvinism-and-arminianism
Turretin, F. (1992). Institutes of elenctic theology (G. M. Giger, Trans.). Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing. (Original work published 1679-1685)
Ware, B. A. (2000). God's lesser glory: The diminished God of open theism. Crossway Books.
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed.). Free Press. (Original work published 1929)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Theological Journal Kerugma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
